911 Truth for Aotearoa

truthmama · Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 190 Location: Wellington

Not my debunk but I am always interested in reading any debunking theories....for balance sake Smile

Larry Silverstein LOST MONEY on 911

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some info for conspiracy theorists. Silverstein was awarded $4.6 billion in insurance money but rebuilding the WTC costs $6.3 billion.

Also, he failed to complete the insurance negotiations before 911. Do you still think he knew it was going to happen?

Sammy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Sammy
Find all posts by Sammy

#2 Today, 07:16 AM
loki
Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammy
Silverstein was awarded $4.6 billion in insurance money but rebuilding the WTC costs $6.3 billion.

What about the $3 to 4 billion in low interest - tax exempt liberty bonds he's received since 911?

So lets see, that makes it around 7.6 to 8.6 billion dollars silverstein has recieved officially, unnoficially who knows, and theres another another £3.35 billion in the pot.
That would make it around $1.3 billion to $2.3 billion in extra revenue gathered from the attrocities of 911, if we go by your estimate of $6.3 billion regeneration. Not a bad deal for a guy who admits to having ordered the demolition of wtc 7!

Alieaz · Joined: 20 Jan 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Christchurch

Lets see if we can follow the money...

Lets look at his ORIGINAL investment:

$15 Million Dollars for a 99 year lease transfering controlling power from the Port Authority to Silverstein industries with insurance specifically covering acts of terrorism.

Now lets look at the court settlement:

The Judge ordered that the destruction of World trade centre 1,2 and7 coutned as TWO acts of terrorism and, infact, the court settlement was closer to 7 Billion. So thats not a bad return on investment you might say?

Now lets look at a few other things:

The WTC, though a powerful symbol of american capitalism, was essentially a condemned building and losing money. Silverstein had every intention of pulling them down and rebuilding another, more profitable structure. The question was how to do it without having to mess around with the paperwork and inevitable outcry from the public about the destruction of their beloved towers.

So its very likely he get together with the Bush's and the Neo-con circle and came up with a way that made it look like a terrorist attack caused the total destruction of the twin towers - providing the Bush adminstration with their 'new Pearl Harbour' - and clearing the way for the new building.

As horrifying as it all sounds, it actually makes pretty good business sense.

I suppose we tell that to the families of the victims?

My real worry now is that with Bush gone it may be harder to get people to confront the past and look into the facts, both in terms of scientific evident and the money trails - which I've just got started on, believe me.

The catch cry might be "let it be".

It is up to us to be the eyes and ears and face of the quest for truth - so that we never let our people be apathetic to affairs of the world. Not now. Not ever. There is too much at stake.

AG
_________________
Woe unto them that take authority as the truth, as opposed to truth as the authority.

truthmama · Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 190 Location: Wellington

Yes wholeheartedly agree ! Its up to us to make sure we (911 truth) are rewriting history now from the Victors position - Poor old USA seems to be losing the war in Iraq, Gaza etc etc

The families deserve a full, honest investigation !